Trauma Speaks
  • Home
  • Services
    • Mental Health Workshops
    • Mental Health First Aid Kits
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Newsletter
  • Get Involved
    • Opportunities >
      • Mental Health Fest
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • Services
    • Mental Health Workshops
    • Mental Health First Aid Kits
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Newsletter
  • Get Involved
    • Opportunities >
      • Mental Health Fest
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • Contact us






​Monthly Blogs

Notify Me

Benefits of Taking Your Child to a Mental Health Professional

8/3/2025

6 Comments

 
    Early mental health intervention can yield positive outcomes and help prevent future issues across various areas of a child’s development. This can include improvements in emotional, behavioral, academic, and social domains. Receiving care from mental health professionals (such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and counselors) can help improve emotional regulation, strengthen family relationships, enhance school performance, and support healthy long-term development (Simeonova, Akee & Copeland, 2023). 

Improved Emotional Well-Being

    Psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been found to help alleviate symptoms of anxiety and depression in youth (Dickson, Kuhnert, Lavell & Rapee, 2022; Cujipers et al., 2023). CBT and related treatments can help anxious children learn to manage fears and reduce avoidance, leading to significant decreases in anxiety symptoms and diagnoses (Dickson et al., 2022). Similarly, previous literature suggests that psychotherapy is effective for treating depression in children and adolescents, with roughly 54% of youth achieving clinically significant improvement with therapy (versus about 32% with no treatment) (Cujipers et al., 2023). These effects may be attributed to improvements in emotional regulation and self-esteem after engaging in therapy. Through techniques like reframing negative thoughts, recognizing emotions, and practicing relaxation or mindfulness, children and teens can learn healthier ways to identify and manage complex emotions. 

    Somatic therapy can be beneficial for youth who experience trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Somatic therapies like Sensorimotor Psychotherapy (SP) and Somatic Experiencing (SE) are effective in helping youth process trauma by focusing on body-based memories and sensations rather than verbal recounting, which can be overwhelming for children (Classen et al., 2021). Body-focused therapies help children and adolescents increase awareness of bodily cues linked to stress and dysregulation, which enhances their ability to manage strong emotions like fear, anger, or sadness (Maldei, Maier & Burger, 2021). Additionally, EMDR and other somatic-based therapies have been linked to reductions in PTSD symptoms, particularly when trauma is stored as non-verbal, bodily memory in youth (Scelles & Bulnes, 2021).

    Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has been widely studied as a treatment for adolescents with pervasive suicidal ideation (S/I), self-harm behaviors, and emotion dysregulation. It combines individual therapy, group skills training, coaching, and regular therapist sessions. DBT is grounded in three main theories: behavioral theory (changing problematic behaviors), biosocial theory (understanding emotional vulnerability and invalidation), and dialectical philosophy (balancing acceptance and change) (Rizvi et al., 2024). DBT for adolescents (DBT-A) consistently shows moderate to large effects in reducing self-harm, suicidal ideation, and emotional dysregulation compared to other therapies (Kothgassner et al., 2021; Syversen et al., 2024). Findings suggest that DBT-A leads to greater reductions in suicide attempts and overall self-harm, with benefits often sustained up to 1–3 years post-treatment. Among queer youth at high risk for suicide, many experienced significant improvements in emotion regulation, depression, borderline symptoms, and coping strategies  (Poon et al., 2022). DBT can help manage anger and other aspects of emotional dysregulation by utilizing coping strategies (Goldstein et al., 2023; Haktanir et al., 2023). These can include understanding anger and its sources, as well as learning how to channel and express anger more constructively. 

Social and Interpersonal Skills

    Therapy for children and adolescents can enhance their social skills and relationships with others. Many youth may struggle with peer interactions, and mental health professionals can help them develop the tools to navigate the social world more effectively. Through role-playing, group therapy sessions, or targeted social skills training, children learn and practice important interpersonal behaviors like sharing, assertiveness, active listening, and empathy (Addington et al., 2021). For adolescents, therapy can address issues like peer pressure, loneliness, or communication difficulties. By discussing their social experiences in counseling, teens often gain perspective and confidence in handling relationships. Therapists may coach them on strategies for dealing with bullying or exclusion, which can aid in building resilience (Gubbels et al., 2021; Gilmore et al., 2022).

Academic and School Performance

    Mental health treatment for youth is linked not only to personal well-being but also to improved academic performance and school outcomes. Research shows that effective therapy can produce meaningful gains in various academically relevant areas (Sulimani-Aidan & Melkman, 2021). Psychotherapy showed an overall positive effect on academic-related outcomes, including improvements in classroom attendance, academic achievement test scores, and self-reported school adjustment (Cujipers et al., 2023). Therapy often targets skills that are crucial for academic success, such as organization, time management, and problem-solving. Many interventions aid in teaching children how to plan tasks or cope with stress. By boosting hope and self-esteem, therapy helps children feel more connected and competent at school. 

Long-Term Developmental Benefits

    Early mental health intervention can yield long-term benefits that extend into adolescence and adulthood. In a longitudinal study tracking children who received mental health treatment versus those who did not, the treated children were found to have fewer depression and anxiety symptoms by age 30. They also achieved better economic and educational outcomes in adulthood compared to their untreated peers (Simeonova et al., 2023). This suggests that getting help early not only improves how a child is doing in the present but also sets them up for a more successful and stable future. 

References:​
  • Addington, J., Liu, L., Santesteban‐Echarri, O., Brummitt, K., Braun, A., Cadenhead, K. S., Cornblatt, B. A., Holden, J. L., & Granholm, E. (2021). Cognitive behavioural social skills training: Methods of a randomized controlled trial for youth at risk of psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13102
  • Classen, C. C., Pain, C., Field, N. P., & Woods, P. (2021). Somatic approaches to treating complex trauma in youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 14(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-021-00349-z​
  • Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., Ciharova, M., Miguel, C., Noma, H., Stikkelbroek, Y., & Furukawa, T. A. (2023). The effects of psychological treatments of depression in children and adolescents on response, reliable change, and deterioration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01884-6
  • Dickson, S. J., Kuhnert, R. L., Lavell, C. H., & Rapee, R. M. (2022). Impact of psychotherapy for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders on global and domain-specific functioning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 25(4), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00402-7
  • Gilmore, R., Ziviani, J., Chatfield, M. D., Goodman, S., & Sakzewski, L. (2022). Social skills group training in adolescents with disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 125, 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104218
  • Goldstein, T. R., Merranko, J., Rode, N., Sylvester, R., Hotkowski, N. J., Fersch-Podrat, R., Hafeman, D., Rasim Somer Diler, Sakolsky, D., Franzen, P. L., & Birmaher, B. (2023). Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents with bipolar disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 81(1). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3399
  • Gubbels, J., van der Stouwe, T., Castenmiller, Y. L., van der Zouwen, M., Asscher, J. J., Hoeve, M., van der Laan, P. H., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2020). The effectiveness of social skills training (SST) for juvenile delinquents: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09419-w
  • Haktanir, A., Aydil, D., Baloğlu, M., & Kesici, Ş. (2023). The use of dialectical behavior therapy in adolescent anger management: A systematic review. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28(3), 135910452211480. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045221148075
  • Kothgassner, O. D., Goreis, A., Robinson, K., Huscsava, M. M., Schmahl, C., & Plener, P. L. (2021). Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 51(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291721001355
  • Maldei, T., Maier, H., & Burger, M. (2021). Somatic experiencing in youth trauma treatment: A pilot study. Traumatology, 27(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000272 
  • Poon, J., Galione, J. N., Grocott, L. R., Horowitz, K. J., Kudinova, A. Y., & Kim, K. L. (2022). Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT‐A): Outcomes among sexual minorities at high risk for suicide. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12828
  • Rizvi, S. L., Bitran, A. M., Oshin, L. A., Yin, Q., & Ruork, A. K. (2024). The state of the science: Dialectical behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2024.02.006
  • Scelles, R. & Bulnes, M. (2021). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in child trauma. Child and Youth Care Forum, 50(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-020-09578-w
  • Simeonova, E., Akee, R., & Copeland, W. (2023). Child mental health, family circumstance, and long-term success: The effect of household income. Journal of Human Resources, 59, 77-107. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.1222-12709R2
  • Sulimani‐Aidan, Y., & Melkman, E. (2022). School belonging and hope among at‐risk youth: The contribution of academic support provided by youths’ social support networks. Child and Family Social Work, 27(4), 700-710. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12918
  • Syversen, A. M., Schønning, V., Fjellheim, G. S., Elgen, I., & Wergeland, G. J. (2024). Evaluation of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents in routine clinical practice: a pre-post study. BMC Psychiatry, 24(1), 447. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05876-z
6 Comments

SP vs SE vs EMDR

4/5/2025

5 Comments

 
    A common misconception is that the mind is separate from the body and cannot impact each other. It has been found, however, that there is a strong connection between them. They can benefit or harm each other. The mind-body connection is a concept that represents the influence one has on the other. According to the American Heart Association (2021), psychological health can help reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and improve heart health. Other benefits include better sleep quality, stronger social bonds, reduced pain, and more (Ingaki & Ross, 2021). Consequently, it’s important to remember that if we experience chronic stress and complex trauma, it can contribute to a higher risk of CVD and cancer development (Lurz & Ladwig, 2022; Dai et al., 2020). This can also lead to an imbalance in homeostasis, resulting in emotional dysregulation and other pathophysiological complications (Yaribeygi et al., 2017). Stress can be a triggering factor for diseases and mental disorders. 
    Non-traditional types of therapies that can help restore the mind-body connection are Sensorimotor Psychotherapy (SP), Somatic Experiencing (SE), and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR). SP is a holistic method based on the understanding that the body stores implicit memory fragments that signal danger in the absence of immediate and acute threats (Classen et al., 2021). It consists of three steps: 
  • Phase 1: regulation of arousal and emotions
  • Phase 2: re-processing traumatic memory
  • Phase 3: addressing future steps that support overall success in life
    Another type of mind-body therapy is somatic experiencing. Developed by Peter Levine, it focuses on healing trauma by having individuals view their bodies as a gateway to explore traumatic memories. It helps promote safer and more comfortable bodily experiences (Maldei et al., 2021). One of the main differences between SP and SE is that the latter avoids directly evoking traumatic memories and does not focus on thoughts and feelings related to the traumatic experience. Instead, it is used as a way to recognize where the trauma resides in the body. 
EMDR is another psychotherapeutic approach that was initially intended to help treat Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). It involves a series of eye movement alternations that has been found to help reduce symptoms (Scelles and Bulnes, 2021). It consists of eight steps that include relaxation techniques, installation and bolstering of inner resources, and training to face internal difficulties. EMDR has been found to improve symptoms of PTSD faster than any other form of therapy (Hase, 2021). 
    SP, SE, and EMDR can be considered non-traditional treatments for trauma because of their focus on bodily sensations and awareness. They are used to recognize the interconnection between emotional, cognitive, and physiological processes without the need for verbal processing of trauma. They help improve the regulation of the autonomic nervous system which is something that can be often overlooked in traditional therapies. It is important to note that they can have limitations based on their context. Because SP is experienced through phases, it can be time-intensive and less suitable for individuals who require short-term symptom stabilization. For SE, it is the only method to not include an active processing of traumatic memories. Because it lacks this cognitive aspect, SE alone may not be sufficient, especially for individuals with extreme symptoms. Lastly, because EMDR requires an individual to relive traumatic experiences, this can be overwhelming for those with severe dissociation and emotional dysregulation. It is important to recognize which methods of therapy would best fit our own needs and experiences. 
​

References
  • Classen, C. C., Hughes, L., Clark, C., Hill Mohammed, B., Woods, P., & Beckett, B. (2020). A pilot RCT of a body-oriented group therapy for complex trauma survivors: An adaptation of sensorimotor psychotherapy. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2020.1760173 
  • Dai, S., Mo, Y., Wang, Y., Xiang, B., Liao, Q., Zhou, M., Li, X., Li, Y., Xiong, W., Li, G., Guo, C., & Zeng, Z. (2020). Chronic stress promotes cancer development. Frontiers in Oncology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01492. 
  • Hase, M. (2021). The structure of EMDR therapy: A guide for the therapist. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(12), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660753 
  • Inagaki, T. K., & Ross, L. P. (2020). A body-to-mind perspective on social connection: Physical warmth potentiates brain activity to close others and subsequent feelings of social connection. Emotion, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000749 
  • Levine, G. N., Cohen, B. E., Commodore-Mensah, Y., Fleury, J., Huffman, J. C., Khalid, U., Labarthe, D. R., Lavretsky, H., Michos, E. D., Spatz, E. S., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2021). Psychological health, well-being, and the mind-heart-body connection: A scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation, 143(10). https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000947 
  • Lurz, J., & Ladwig, K. H. (2022). Mind and body interventions in cardiology. Herz, 47(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-022-05104-y 
  • Maldei, T., Kuhfuß, M., Hetmanek, A., & Baumann, N. (2021). Somatic experiencing – effectiveness and key factors of a body-oriented trauma therapy: A scoping literature review. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), 192-203.. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1929023 
  • Scelles, C., & Bulnes, L. C. (2021). EMDR as treatment option for conditions other than PTSD: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(64), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644369 
  • Yaribeygi, H., Panahi, Y., Sahraei, H., Johnston, T., & Sahebkar, A. (2017). The impact of stress on body function: A review. EXCLI Journal, 16, 1057-1072. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2017-480. 
5 Comments

Mental Health Issues Faced by Minority College Students

9/7/2024

2 Comments

 
      College presents numerous challenges for students, and this transition can be particularly daunting for minority students, as it often amplifies underlying issues that contribute to feelings of isolation, stress, and anxiety. Kodish et al. (2021) mentioned that in 2019, 42% of U.S. college students reported high rates of depression, with 63.6% experiencing overwhelming anxiety. Furthermore, a recent article from ScienceBeta in 2023 highlighted a significant increase in the rate of depression among minority students at predominantly white colleges compared to their white peers (Demetre, 2023).
     First-generation students especially often go through various obstacles like financial stress, lack of familial support, racial disparity, social challenges, and so on. Demetre (2023) further emphasizes the impact of lack of belongingness on the mental health of college students. Navigating some of these issues can be hard for this group of college students, especially without appropriate access or support. 
      Racial inequality in colleges can also exacerbate the feeling of isolation and stress among minority groups. This may come in the form of a lack of faculty members of color dealing with student affairs, microaggression, discrimination, and stigmatization. Lack of representation may burden students with isolation or feelings of inadequacy. Subtle forms of racism or racial-driven situations take a toll on the mental health of minority students especially when constantly exposed to these types of situations. 
    Lack of appropriate support particularly in areas like intersectionality and identity. The interconnected nature of social categorizations like race, gender, and class adds another layer to the mental health experiences of minority college students. The CDC reported in a 2021 article that feelings of distress were found to be more common among LGBTQ+ students, female students, and students across racial and ethnic groups. Navigating multiple facets of identity while trying to find a sense of belonging can be particularly daunting.
      In conclusion, while college is a time of growth and learning, it is essential to recognize and address the specific mental health challenges faced by minority students. By acknowledging the unique pressures, they experience, from the burden of representation to navigating microaggressions and accessing support, we can work towards creating a more inclusive and supportive college environment. Empowering students to embrace their identities and providing them with the resources they need to thrive is crucial in ensuring that all students have equal opportunities for success in their academic and personal journey.


References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024). Mental health. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/mental-health/index.htm
Demetre, D. C. (2023). Depression among minority college students. ScienceBeta. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://sciencebeta.com/depression-rminority-college-students/
Kodish, T., Lau, A. S., Gong-Guy, E., Congdon, E., Arnaudova, I., Schmidt, M., Shoemaker, L., & Craske, M. G. (2022). Enhancing racial/ethnic equity in college student mental health through innovative screening and treatment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 49(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-021-01163-1 
2 Comments
<<Previous

    Categories

    All
    Anxiety
    Autism
    Burnout
    Consent
    Coping Skills
    Current News
    De-escalation
    Depression
    Eating Disorder
    Grief
    Impostor Syndrome
    LGBTQ+
    Media Review
    Mental Health Awareness
    Narcissism
    Organizational
    Personal
    Pets
    PTSD
    Racism
    Relationships
    Research
    Self Care
    Self-isolation
    Sexual Assault
    Social Media
    Sports
    Suicide
    Technology
    Tips
    Trauma
    Veterans
    Violence
    Workplace Violence
    Youth

    Archives

    August 2025
    April 2025
    September 2024
    August 2024
    June 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    November 2017
    August 2017

Be Heard. Break the Stigma. 
© TraumaSpeaks 2017
Los Angeles, CA
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.